77. The Commission notes that neither the arguments nor the prayers made by the Complainants are contrary to any of the principles contained in the African Charter or the Constitutive Act of the African Union. Consequently, the Commission considers that the requirement under Article 56(2) has been met. 78. With respect to Article 56(3) of the African Charter, which provides that Communications shall be considered if they are not written in disparaging or insulting language directed at the State concerned and its institutions, or to the Organization of African Unity, the Commission has not observed any insulting or disparaging language in the Communication, and accordingly finds that Article 56(3) of the Charter has been complied with. 79. In relation to Article 56(4) of the African Charter, the Commission notes the Complainants contention that the alleged violations, for which the Victim is seeking remedies, are within her personal knowledge. Furthermore, various documents were submitted in support of the Victim's allegations, such as: Annex AS2: a photocopy of Immigration stamp on entry in Namibia; Annex AS4: Email from the Victim to the Media in Namibia, 15 November 2017; Annex AS5:.Ph9tocopy of air ticket with the Victim's name, from :Windhoek, Namibia to Nairobi, Kenya; among others. 80. Having reviewed the documents submitted in support of the Communication, the Commission has not found evidence that the information submitted is based exclusively on news disseminated through the media; consequently, the Commission finds that the requirement of Article 56(4) has been fulfilled. 81. Article 56(5) of the African Charter requires that Communications be submitted after exhausting local remedies, if any, unless it is obvious that this procedure is unduly prolonged. In this regard, the Commission notes that it is a e accepted principle in international law that before an international bo _, 1 '-' ~ ed, the applicant must exhaust all available legal domestic remedie .} l", ~.,.,.,:.,.,. :J ~ 9 !l t Vo r. <!! ~</~ ~(J•(JA ., ~ :q ,c:-..,., -..,,, e Development of its Non-State Communication Procedures,' Volume 20 Human Rights Qu~~~~~ e also, Communications 54/91: Malawi African Association v. Mauritania; 61/91: Amnesty International v. Mauritania; 98/93: Ms. Sarr Diop, Union Interafricaine des Droits de !'Homme and RADDHO v. Mauritania; 164/97, 196/97 Collectif des Veuves et Ayants-droit v. Mauritania; 210/98: Association Mauritanienne des Droits de !'Homme v. Mauritania 16 Chidi Anselm Odinkalu and Camilla Christensen, 'The African Commission on Hun 15