the alleged violations are continuing, as the Applicant remains convicted and is awaiting execution of the death sentence imposed upon him by the High Court of Bukoba, on the basis of what he considers an unfair process.11 30. The Court also holds that it has territorial jurisdiction over this Application given that alleged violations occurred within the Respondent State’s territory. 31. In light of the foregoing, the Court holds that it has jurisdiction to hear this Application. VI. ADMISSIBILITY 32. In terms of Article 6(2) of the Protocol, “the Court shall rule on the admissibility of cases taking into account the provisions of Article 56 of the Charter”. 33. Pursuant to Rule 49(1) and 50 of the Rules, “The Court shall ascertain the admissibility of an Application filed before it in accordance with Article 56 of the Charter, Article 6(2) of the Protocol and these Rules.” 34. Rule 50(2) of the Rules, which in substance restates the provisions of Article 56 of the Charter, provides as follows: Applications filed before the Court shall comply with all of the following conditions: a) Indicate their authors even if the latter request anonymity; b) Are compatible with the Constitutive Act of the African Union and with the Charter; 11 Mtikila v. Tanzania, (merits), supra, § 84; African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights v. Kenya (merits) (26 May 2017) 2 AfCLR 9, § 65; Kennedy Ivan v. United Republic of Tanzania (merits and reparations) (28 March 2019) 3 AfCLR 48, § 29(ii). 10