000828 inadmissible.lo ln the present case, since the Application has failed to fulfil the requirement under Article 56(6) of the charter, which is restated in Rule 40(6) of the Rules, the Court, therefore, finds that the Application is inadmissible. vt!. cosTs 57. Both the Applicant and the Respondent did not make any submissions on costs 58. The Court notes that Rule 30 of its Rules provides that "untess othenarise decided by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs.,, 59. In the present Application, the court decides that each pafi shall bear its own costs VIII. 60. OPERATIVE PART For these reasons, THE COURT, Unanimously On jurisdiction i. ii. Drsmrsses the objections to its material jurisdiction; Declares that it has jurisdiction. On admissibility iii. 16 Dlsmisses the obiection to the admissibility of the Application based on the lack of exhaustion of local remedies; Application No. 016/20'17. Ruling of 28t1gl2}1g, (Jurisdiction and Admissibility), Dexter Johnson v Grara S 57. 15