African Human Rights CLA 2.0

African Human Rights CLA 2.0

    • BASE DE DONNÉES
      • Commission africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples (CADHP)
      • Comité africain d'experts sur les droits et le bien-être de l'enfant
      • Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples
      • Cour de justice de la Communauté de la CEDEAO (Cour de la CEDEAO)
      • Tribunal de la SADC
      • Cour de justice de l'Afrique de l'Est
    • À PROPOS
    • AIDE
    • English
    • Português
    • العربية
    • Français
    • Bibliothèque
    • S'identifier
Astuces de recherche
Trié par
  • Titre
  • Date ajoutée
  • Date de modification
  • Case Head Notes
  • Année de la décision
  • Date d'adoption
  • Résultats
  • Résumé
  • Résumé de l'affaire
  • ECCJ App no.
  • ECCJ Jud No.
  • Réservations
  • Treaty Series No
Vue en cartesVue tabulaireVue en carte
30 Listé sur un total de 1414 Entités

002/2011 Request for Advisory Opinion by Marcel Ceccaldi

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Avis consultatif
Mots clés
  • Non-conformité
Résumé
A letter dated August 22nd 2011 was received by a registrar at the court, where advocate Marcel Ceccaldi requested an advisory opinion from the court on behalf of the Peoples Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. The court instructed the registrar to ask the author of the request to show proof that he was acting on behalf of Libya, but unfortunately the author declined to respond to this request. The attitude of the author of the request for advisory opinion, showed unwillingness to pursue the matter further. As a result of this behavior, the court unanimously decided to remove the request from the general list of the court.
Etat
  • Libye
Géolocalisation du pays
Libya: 32° 33′ 21″ N, 13° 16′ 48″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

042-2016 - Collectif des Anciens Travailleurs du Laboratoire ALS V. Mali

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Arrêt
Mots clés
  • Droit à la santé
  • Droit à un environnement satisfaisant
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Droits des travailleurs
Résumé
According to the records, on 1 February 2012,ihe Applicants, who claim to have been victims of lead poisoning during their service, seized the Prosecutor at the Commune lll Court of First instance of the District of Bamako of a criminal complaint, followed by a letter addressed to the Attorney General at the Court of Appeal of Bamako on the same subject. The Applicants allege that the Australian Laboratory, which specializes in the chemical analysis of samples to determine the content of gold and other metals, used in this respect, toxic products such as acid, butyl isobutyl (DIBK), and solvents such as nitrate, sodium, lithium, borax, sodium carbonate, sodium oxide and lead.
Etat
  • Mali
Géolocalisation du pays
Mali: 17° 34′ 14″ N, 3° 59′ 46″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

007/2023 - Democratic Republic of Congo v Republic of Rwanda

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Arrêt
Mots clés
  • Admissibilité
Résumé
DRC alleges human rights violations committed in connection with an armed conflict between it and a coalition that includes Rwanda and the M23 armed group. The Court determined that it has jurisdiction to hear the matter and declared the application admissible. The Court ordered the Respondent State to file its response on the merits.
Etat
  • République Démocratique du Congo
  • Rwanda
Géolocalisation du pays
Democratic Republic of the Congo: 4° 2′ 18″ S, 21° 45′ 31″ E
Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

ECW/CCJ/JUD/02/25 - The Incorporated Trustees of Prince & Princess Charles Offokoja Foundation & Anor. v Nigeria

Aperçu
Preview
Type de document
  • Arrêt
Mots clés
  • Admissibilité
  • Compétence de la Cour
  • Délai raisonnable
  • Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
  • Parties au procès
  • Violations des droits de l'homme
Résumé de l'affaire
ECOWAS Court has jurisdiction over human rights violations under Article 9(4) of its Protocol. Mere allegation of human rights violation is sufficient to confer jurisdiction. The Court is not an appellate body for national court decisions but can hear claims of human rights violations arising from domestic proceedings. Cause of action exists when facts disclose a legal right, even if not yet legally maintained. Admissibility requires claimants to have victim status, not be anonymous, and not have the matter pending in another international court. NGOs with legal personality can represent victims in human rights claims. Representative actions require proof of victim status of grantor; indirect victims must provide credible evidence of relationship. Application dismissed due to lack of locus standi; grantors of mandate were neither direct nor indirect victims. Parties bear their own costs.
État
  • Nigeria
Conclusion
Déclaré irrecevable
Année de la décision
13 mai 2025
Géolocalisation du pays
Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
Vue

010/11 Efoua Mbozo’o Samuel v. The Pan African Parliament

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Décision
Mots clés
  • Droits des travailleurs
  • Juridiction
Résumé
Efoua Mbozo'o Samuel, domiciled in Yaoundé, Cameroon,brought before the Court, a case against the Pan African Parliament, alleging breach of paragraph 4 of hiscontract of employment and of Article 13 (a) and (b) of the OAU Staff Regulations, and improper refusal torenew his contract and to re-grade him
Etat
  • UA/Organe de l'UA
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • Aucun indiqué
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

01/08 Michelot Yogogombaye v Senegal (Separate Opinion - Fatsah Ouguergouz)

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Opinion séparée
Mots clés
  • Droit à l'information
  • Justice transitionnelle
  • Procédure de la Cour Africaine
  • Rétroactivité de l'infraction
Résumé
Fatsah Ouguergouz is of the opinion that the Applicant indeed has the right to know why it has taken nearly one year between the date of receipt of his application at the Registry and the date on which the Court took its decision thereon. Senegal, on the other hand, has the right to know why the Court chose to make a solemn ruling on the application by means of a Judgment, rather than reject it de plano with a simple letter issued by the Registry. The two Parties also have the right to know the reasons for which their prayers in respect of the costs and expenses, respectively, of the case, have been rejected; the Applicant should also know why his prayer in this regard was addressed on the basis of Rule 30 of the Interim Rules of the Court (hereinafter referred toas the "Rules") on Legal Costs, whereas the Court could have equally, if not exclusively, treated this prayer on the basis of Rule 31 on Legal Assistance.
Etat
  • Sénégal
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • Aucun indiqué
Géolocalisation du pays
Senegal: 14° 29′ 51″ N, 14° 27′ 9″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

ECW/CCJ/JUD/26/19 Salifo Sawadogo v Burkina Faso

Aperçu
Preview
Type de document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Immunité / Privilèges (diplomatiques, présidentiels, parlementaires, etc.)
  • Insurrection
  • Justice transitionnelle
  • Sécurité intérieure de l'État
  • Tribunaux militaires
Résumé de l'affaire
Following the failure of the military coup d'état in Burkina Faso on 16th September 2015, judicial information was opened against all persons who participated as author, co-author or accomplice of the coup; Accordingly, there were apparent elements from the investigation of this process likely to determinate the criminal liability of the applicant, Mr SAWADOGO Salifou, then a Parliament Member in the National Assembly; In view of the gravity of the facts, the Military Court wanted the applicant's criminal liability to be invoked, as those of other persons persecuted for the same facts.
État
  • Burkina Faso
Conclusion
Déclaré irrecevable
Année de la décision
26 sept. 2019
Géolocalisation du pays
Burkina Faso: 12° 14′ 18″ N, 1° 33′ 42″ W
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
Vue

ECW/CCJ/JUD/21/25 - Charles Nii Armah Mensah v. Republic of Ghana and Gaming Commission

Aperçu
Preview
Type de document
  • Décision
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Abus des pouvoirs présidentiels
  • Diligence raisonnable
  • Droits civils et politiques
  • Juridiction
  • Liberté d'expression / Droits numériques
  • Liberté de la personne
  • Mise en œuvre des décisions
Résumé de l'affaire
he ECOWAS Court ruled on the jurisdiction, admissibility, and merits of the dispute involving the rights of the applicant against the State and regulatory authority, addressing freedom of expression, due process, and implementation of national and regional legal provisions
État
  • Ghana
Conclusion
Affaire rejetée
Année de la décision
8 mai 2025
Géolocalisation du pays
Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
Vue

ECW/CCJ/JUD/39/25 La Ligue Togolaise des Droits de l’Homme and Seven (07) Others v. Togo

Aperçu
Preview
Type de document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Liberté d'association
  • Liberté de circulation
  • Liberté de réunion
  • Opérations des milices / Conflits armés
  • Right to Physical and Moral Integrity
  • Violations des droits de l'homme
Résumé de l'affaire
Human rights claims require credible, concrete evidence, not mere assertions. States bear positive obligations to protect rights but liability depends on failure to fulfill these duties demonstrably. Freedom of movement, assembly, and security rights are fundamental but may be subject to lawful restrictions. Allegations of militia violence require evidence linking the militias to the State for State responsibility. The ECOWAS Court will not rule on claims lacking proof of rights violations.
Conclusion
Décidé sur le fond
Année de la décision
7 juil. 2025
Géolocalisation du pays
Togo: 8° 37′ 10″ N, 0° 49′ 29″ E
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
Vue

046/2016 - APDF & IHRDA v Republic of Mali

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Droit des femmes à la succession
  • Droits des femmes
  • IHRDA
  • Législation nationale
  • Mariage des enfants
  • Pratiques traditionnelles néfastes
Résumé
In a bid to modernise its legislation by bringing it in line with the evolving international human rights law, the Government of Mali launched, in 1998, a vast operation to codify the rights of individuals and the family. This project, which was subject to broad popular consultation, received expert input prior to the drafting of Law No. 201 1-087 establishing the Persons and Family Code. However, the Applicants submit that the law as promulgated violates several provisions of international human rights instruments ratified by the Respondent State.
Etat
  • Mali
Géolocalisation du pays
Mali: 17° 34′ 14″ N, 3° 59′ 46″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

007/11 Youssef Ababou v. Morocco

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Décision
Mots clés
  • Citoyenneté/nationalité et droits connexes
  • Juridiction
Résumé
In his application, the Applicant alleges as follows: - the Kingdom of Morocco has refused, and continues to refuse, to issue him his documents, which include, a national identity card and a passport;- it has been many years since he started requesting his rights to these civil status documents from the Consulate General of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Ambassador of the Kingdom of Morocco in Algeria, “but the latter have systematically refused to respect [his] rights to these documents".
Etat
  • Maroc
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • Aucun indiqué
Géolocalisation du pays
Morocco: 31° 47′ 30″ N, 7° 5′ 33″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

ECW/CCJ/JUD/17/25 - Lacerda Yoann v. Republic of Cabo Verde

Aperçu
Preview
Type de document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Admissibilité
  • Développement économique, social et culturel
  • Dommages-intérêts
  • Droit à la santé
  • Épuisement des recours locaux
  • Juridiction
  • Violations des droits de l'homme
Résumé de l'affaire
In Lacerda Yoann v. Republic of Cabo Verde (Application No. ECW/CCJ/APP/38/23; Judgment No. ECW/CCJ/JUD/17/25, 7 April 2025), the ECOWAS Court of Justice confirmed its jurisdiction and declared the application admissible. The Applicant, a Cabo Verde citizen, claimed that the State violated his right to health under Article 16 of the African Charter, Article 12 of the ICESCR, and Article 25 of the UDHR, by failing to provide access to necessary medicines for his hereditary immunodeficiency. The Court found that the Defendant State had authorized the import of the medicine and provided guidance on accessing it, but the Applicant failed to follow the prescribed procedures. Consequently, the Court held that the Defendant did not violate the Applicant’s right to health, dismissed all other claims as unfounded, and ordered that the parties bear their own costs.
État
  • Cap Vert
Conclusion
Décidé sur le fond
Année de la décision
7 avr. 2025
Géolocalisation du pays
Cape Verde: 16° 32′ 20″ N, 23° 2′ 30″ W
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
Vue

005/11 Daniel Amare & Mulugeta Amare v. Mozambique & Mozambique Airlines

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Décision
Mots clés
  • Manque de compétence manifesté par la Cour africaine
  • Juridiction
Résumé
In their application, the Applicants allege as follows, namely that: - In or about November 2008, having procured the requisite passports, visas and air tickets, they set out to travel to Maputo, Mozambique via Nairobi, Kenya.- At Nairobi, they transited from the Ethiopian Airlines to a Mozambique Airline flight to Maputo.- However, the flight did not take them to Maputo but landed in Pemba, Mozambique, where they were stranded for a period of twenty six (26) days.4. The Applicants further allege that: - During that period, they were subjected by the Mozambique Immigration Officials to diverse hardships, including demands for bribes, which they resisted, confiscating of their passports and visas, robbery of $1000 from them, torture, and deportation to Dar-es-Salaam.
Etat
  • Mozambique
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • Aucun indiqué
Géolocalisation du pays
Mozambique: 18° 39′ 57″ S, 35° 31′ 46″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

020/2015 – Livinus Daudi Manyuka v. United Republic of Tanzania

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Arrêt
Mots clés
  • Allégations de vol à main armée
  • Arrestation et détention arbitraire
  • Délai raisonnable
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
  • Liberté de circulation
  • Rétroactivité de l'infraction
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
Résumé
It emerges from the Application that on 4 November 1999 the Applicant, and two other individuals, were charged with the offence of robbery with violence in the District Court at Mbinga, Ruvuma Region. On 15 May 2000, they were convicted and each sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment.
Etat
  • Tanzanie
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • Aucun indiqué
Géolocalisation du pays
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

004/2015 – Andrew Ambrose Cheusi v. United Republic of Tanzania

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Allégations de vol à main armée
  • Délai raisonnable
  • Droit à la dignité
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
Résumé
It emerges from the application that, on 6 June 2003, the applicant was arrested for having committed armed robbery of a pick-up vehicle at a place known as Sinza Madukani, in Dar es Salaam. He was prosecuted for the offense before the Kibaha District Magistrate Court. He was released on bail on 7 November 2003. While he was out on bail in this case, on September 2004, he was again arrested and charged in a second case before the same court, for conspiring to commit a felony and for the offence of robbery. It was alleged that he had stolen a saloon car at korogwe area in kibaha District.
Etat
  • Tanzanie
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • CADHP 7.1.c : Droit à la défense
  • CADHP 7.1.d : Droit d'être jugé dans un délai raisonnable par un tribunal impartial
Géolocalisation du pays
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

004/2015 – Andrew Ambrose Cheusi v. United Republic of Tanzania (Separate Opinion By Judge Bensaoula Chafika)

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Opinion séparée
Mots clés
  • Allégations de vol à main armée
  • Délai raisonnable
  • Droit à la dignité
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
Résumé
It emerges from the application that, on 6 June 2003, the applicant was arrested for having committed armed robbery of a pick-up vehicle at a place known as Sinza Madukani, in Dar es Salaam. He was prosecuted for the offense before the Kibaha District Magistrate Court. He was released on bail on 7 November 2003. While he was out on bail in this case, on September 2004, he was again arrested and charged in a second case before the same court, for conspiring to commit a felony and for the offence of robbery. It was alleged that he had stolen a saloon car at korogwe area in kibaha District.
Etat
  • Tanzanie
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • CADHP 7.1.c : Droit à la défense
  • CADHP 7.1.d : Droit d'être jugé dans un délai raisonnable par un tribunal impartial
Géolocalisation du pays
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

028/2015 – Kalebi Elisamehe v. United Republic of Tanzania

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
  • Infractions sexuelles
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
  • VBG
  • Viol
Résumé
It emerges from the application that, on 6 March 2004, the applicant was convicted and sentenced by the District Magistrate’s Court of Monduli at monduli District to a thirty (30) year prison sentence for the rape of a twelve (12) year old minor. He was ordered to pay the victim one cow valued at Tanzania Shillings Two Hundred Thousand as compensation. The applicant appealed against the judgement.
Etat
  • Tanzanie
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • CADHP 7.1.c : Droit à la défense
Géolocalisation du pays
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

App 001/2019 for Judgment on Review of App. No. 030/2015 – Ramadhani Issa Malengo v. United Republic of Tanzania

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Arrêt
Mots clés
  • Droit à un procès équitable
Résumé
It emerges from the file that in 1996, the Applicant had an oral agreement with DIMON Ramadhani lssa Malengo (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant") is a national of Tanzania and a tobacco farmer. He resides in Kigwa village, Tabora region and alleges that the Respondent State violated his rights by denying him justice in the National courts.
Etat
  • Tanzanie
Géolocalisation du pays
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

025/2015 – Majid Goa aliad Vedatus v. United Republic of Tanzania

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Égalité devant la loi
  • Lutte contre la discrimination
  • Viol
Résumé
It emerges from the file that on 20 December 2005, the District Court of Tarime, in Criminal case No. 418 of 2005 convicted the Applicant and sentenced him to thirty (30) years imprisonment following conviction for rape of a twelve (12) year old minor.
Etat
  • Tanzanie
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • CADHP 7.1.c : Droit à la défense
Géolocalisation du pays
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

017/2015 – Kennedy Gihana and Others v. Republic of Rwanda

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Citoyenneté/nationalité et droits connexes
  • Droit à la famille
  • Droit au travail
  • Liberté de circulation
  • Liberté de la personne
  • Participation au gouvernement
Résumé
It emerges from the file that the Applicants learnt of the invalidation, by the Respondent State, of their passports and those of other Rwandan nationals when one of them was informed upon applying for a visa to travel to the United States of America, that his name appeared on a list of 14 May 2012, indicating the invalidity of the passports held by all persons included on the said list.
Etat
  • Rwanda
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • CADHP 12:2: Droit de quitter tout pays, y compris le sien, et de revenir dans son pays
  • CADHP 13.1: Droit de participer librement au gouvernement
Géolocalisation du pays
Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

017/2015 – Kennedy Gihana and Others v. Republic of Rwanda (Order on Continuance of Proceedings)

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Ordonnance de poursuite de la procédure
Mots clés
  • Citoyenneté/nationalité et droits connexes
  • Droit à la famille
  • Droit au travail
  • Liberté de circulation
  • Liberté de la personne
  • Participation au gouvernement
Résumé
It emerges from the file that the Applicants learnt of the invalidation, by the Respondent State, of their passports and those of other Rwandan nationals when one of them was informed upon applying for a visa to travel to the United States of America, that his name appeared on a list of 14 May 2012, indicating the invalidity of the passports held by all persons included on the said list.
Etat
  • Rwanda
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • CADHP 12:2: Droit de quitter tout pays, y compris le sien, et de revenir dans son pays
  • CADHP 13.1: Droit de participer librement au gouvernement
Géolocalisation du pays
Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

016/2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Arrêt
Mots clés
  • Droit à la vie
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Meurtre/assassinat
  • Peine de mort
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
Résumé
It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
Etat
  • Ghana
Géolocalisation du pays
Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

016/2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana (Order for provisional mesures (28 September 2017))

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Ordonnance de mesures provisoires
Mots clés
  • Droit à la vie
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Meurtre/assassinat
  • Peine de mort
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
Résumé
It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
Etat
  • Ghana
Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
  • Aucun indiqué
Géolocalisation du pays
Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

016-2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana (Dissenting Opinion of Judge Blaise TCHIKAYA)

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Opinion dissidente
Mots clés
  • Droit à la vie
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Meurtre/assassinat
  • Peine de mort
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
Résumé
It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
Etat
  • Ghana
Géolocalisation du pays
Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

016/2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana (Partly dissenting opinion of Judges Gérard Niyungeko and Rafâa Ben Achour)

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Opinion dissidente
Mots clés
  • Droit à la vie
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Meurtre/assassinat
  • Peine de mort
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
Résumé
It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
Etat
  • Ghana
Géolocalisation du pays
Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

016/2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana (Dissenting Opinion of Judge Rafaâ Ben ACHOUR)

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Opinion dissidente
Mots clés
  • Droit à la vie
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Meurtre/assassinat
  • Peine de mort
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
Résumé
It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
Etat
  • Ghana
Géolocalisation du pays
Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

004/2017 Mulindahabi Fidèle v Republic of Rwanda

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Droit au travail
  • Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
  • Droits des travailleurs
  • Égalité devant la loi
  • Renvoi sans préavis
Résumé
It is apparent from the record, that, on 17 November 2009, following his success in a recruitment test, the applicant signed an employment contract for the position of Head of the Planning and Strategy Section at the State-owned Rwanda Electricity Corporation and Rwanda Water and Sanitation Corporation, which later became the Energy, Water and Sanitation Authority (EWSA). On 13 April 2010, the applicant was dismissed without notice.
Etat
  • Rwanda
Géolocalisation du pays
Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

004/2017 Mulindahabi Fidèle v Republic of Rwanda (Separate Opinion of Judges Rafâa Ben Achour and Blaise Tchikaya (26 June 2020))

Aperçu
Preview
Type de Document
  • Opinion séparée
Mots clés
  • Droit au travail
  • Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
  • Droits des travailleurs
  • Égalité devant la loi
  • Renvoi sans préavis
Résumé
It is apparent from the record, that, on 17 November 2009, following his success in a recruitment test, the applicant signed an employment contract for the position of Head of the Planning and Strategy Section at the State-owned Rwanda Electricity Corporation and Rwanda Water and Sanitation Corporation, which later became the Energy, Water and Sanitation Authority (EWSA). On 13 April 2010, the applicant was dismissed without notice.
Etat
  • Rwanda
Géolocalisation du pays
Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
Vue

MOSES ABIODUN V FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

Aperçu
Preview
Type de document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Admissibilité
  • Allégations de vol à main armée
  • Arrestation et détention arbitraire
  • Brutalités et infractions policières
  • Centres de détention/Conditions
  • Délai raisonnable
  • Droit à un procès équitable
  • Droits civils et politiques
  • IHRDA
  • Juridiction
  • Liberté de circulation
  • Liberté de la personne
  • Traitement cruel et dégradant
  • Violations des droits de l'homme
Résumé de l'affaire
Jurisdiction & Admissibility – The Court has jurisdiction under Article 9(4) of its Protocol; the Application was admissible. Arbitrary Detention – Applicant was detained from 2009 to 2025 without trial or formal charges, violating Articles 6 and 9 of the African Charter/ICCPR. Freedom of Movement – Prolonged detention violated Article 12 of the African Charter/ICCPR. Right to Fair Trial – Detention without trial for over 16 years breached Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter. Cruel & Inhuman Treatment – Prolonged pretrial detention constituted inhuman and degrading treatment (Articles 5 and 7). Reparations – Court ordered immediate release and payment of 20 million naira in compensation; each party bears its own costs.
État
  • Nigeria
Conclusion
Décidé sur le fond
Année de la décision
15 mai 2025
Géolocalisation du pays
Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
Vue

ECW/CCJ/JUD/35/25 Eliam Monsedjoueni Potey v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire

Aperçu
Preview
Type de document
  • Jugement
Mots clés
  • Dommages-intérêts
  • Droit d'exercer une profession
  • Égalité devant la loi
  • Lutte contre la discrimination
  • Violations des droits de l'homme
Résumé de l'affaire
Jurisdiction: The ECOWAS Court has jurisdiction over alleged human rights violations by Member States. Admissibility: The case was admissible as the applicant was identified and no parallel international proceedings existed. Equality Before the Law: Alleged discrimination must be proven with objective evidence; mere claims are insufficient. Discretionary Promotion: Executive discretion in judicial promotions does not automatically violate equality rights. Reparations: Compensation is only awarded if a rights violation is established.
État
  • Côte d'Ivoire
Conclusion
Affaire rejetée
Année de la décision
2 juil. 2025
Géolocalisation du pays
Côte d'Ivoire: 7° 32′ 24″ N, 5° 32′ 49″ W
Comoros: 11° 38′ 44″ S, 43° 19′ 60″ E
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
Vue

30 Listé sur un total de 1414 Entités

30 x en plus 300 x en plus
  • Uwazi est développé par Human Rights Information and Documentation Systems

    uwazi
  •  
  • African Human Rights CLA 2.0
  •  
  • Bibliothèque
  • Connexion
Configuration des filtres
    • 296
    • 1051
  • Type of Document
    ETOU
    • 462
    • 348
    • 108
    • 32
    • 26
    • 20
    • 11
    • 8
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 4
    • 2
    • 1
  • Mots clés
    ETOU
    • 482
    • 285
    • 271
    • 267
    • 253
    • 213
    • 213
    • 206
    • 206
    • 205
    • 163
    • 157
    • 150
    • 126
    • 125
    • 122
    • 118
    • 111
    • 107
    • 103
    • 100
    • 100
    • 99
    • 98
    • 96
    • 90
    • 84
    • 83
    • 81
    • 80
    • 74
    • 73
    • 72
    • 68
    • 67
    • 66
    • 64
    • 63
    • 63
    • 60
    • 60
    • 58
    • 55
    • 51
    • 45
    • 45
    • 43
    • 43
    • 42
    • 41
    • 41
    • 40
    • 39
    • 38
    • 37
    • 37
    • 37
    • 36
    • 34
    • 34
    • 34
    • 33
    • 33
    • 33
    • 32
    • 32
    • 28
    • 27
    • 26
    • 26
    • 25
    • 25
    • 25
    • 25
    • 25
    • 25
    • 24
    • 23
    • 23
    • 23
    • 23
    • 22
    • 21
    • 20
    • 20
    • 19
    • 19
    • 17
    • 17
    • 16
    • 16
    • 16
    • 16
    • 15
    • 15
    • 15
    • 14
    • 12
    • 11
    • 11
    • 11
    • 10
    • 10
    • 10
    • 10
    • 9
    • 9
    • 9
    • 8
    • 8
    • 8
    • 8
    • 8
    • 8
    • 8
    • 7
    • 7
    • 7
    • 7
    • 7
    • 6
    • 6
    • 6
    • 6
    • 6
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 4
    • 4
    • 4
    • 4
    • 4
    • 4
    • 4
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • État Accusé
    ETOU
    • 144
    • 134
    • 46
    • 45
    • 41
    • 38
    • 33
    • 32
    • 32
    • 30
    • 29
    • 27
    • 27
    • 27
    • 26
    • 25
    • 24
    • 23
    • 23
    • 22
    • 19
    • 19
    • 19
    • 18
    • 15
    • 15
    • 14
    • 12
    • 9
    • 9
    • 9
    • 8
    • 8
    • 8
    • 7
    • 7
    • 6
    • 6
    • 6
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 4
    • 4
    • 4
    • 4
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 2
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • ACHPR Rights Alleged to be Violated
    ETOU
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 3
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • ACHPR Rights Violated
    ETOU
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • ACHPR Rights Not Violated
    ETOU
    • 4
    • 3
    • 3
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • Conclusion
    ETOU
    • 512
    • 247
    • 62
    • 62
    • 19
    • 13
    • 12
    • 11
    • 9
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 3
    • 3
    • 2
    • 2
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1

Recherche de texte

Rechercher Description du texte

    Table des matières

     

    Aucune table des matières

    Aucune description de Table des matières

      Pas de références

      Aucune description de références

      Aucune relation

      Aucune description de relation

      0 Sélectionné
        Téléchargez un fichier ZIP ou CSV. Instructions d'importation