- BASE DE DONNÉES
- Commission africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples (CADHP)
- Comité africain d'experts sur les droits et le bien-être de l'enfant
- Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples
- Cour de justice de la Communauté de la CEDEAO (Cour de la CEDEAO)
- Tribunal de la SADC
- Cour de justice de l'Afrique de l'Est
- À PROPOS
- AIDE
Astuces de recherche
002/2011 Request for Advisory Opinion by Marcel Ceccaldi
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Avis consultatif
- Mots clés
- Non-conformité
- Résumé
- A letter dated August 22nd 2011 was received by a registrar at the court, where advocate Marcel Ceccaldi requested an advisory opinion from the court on behalf of the Peoples Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. The court instructed the registrar to ask the author of the request to show proof that he was acting on behalf of Libya, but unfortunately the author declined to respond to this request. The attitude of the author of the request for advisory opinion, showed unwillingness to pursue the matter further. As a result of this behavior, the court unanimously decided to remove the request from the general list of the court.
- Etat
- Libye
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Libya: 32° 33′ 21″ N, 13° 16′ 48″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
042-2016 - Collectif des Anciens Travailleurs du Laboratoire ALS V. Mali
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Arrêt
- Mots clés
- Droit à la santé
- Droit à un environnement satisfaisant
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Droits des travailleurs
- Résumé
- According to the records, on 1 February 2012,ihe Applicants, who claim to have been victims of lead poisoning during their service, seized the Prosecutor at the Commune lll Court of First instance of the District of Bamako of a criminal complaint, followed by a letter addressed to the Attorney General at the Court of Appeal of Bamako on the same subject. The Applicants allege that the Australian Laboratory, which specializes in the chemical analysis of samples to determine the content of gold and other metals, used in this respect, toxic products such as acid, butyl isobutyl (DIBK), and solvents such as nitrate, sodium, lithium, borax, sodium carbonate, sodium oxide and lead.
- Etat
- Mali
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Mali: 17° 34′ 14″ N, 3° 59′ 46″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
007/2023 - Democratic Republic of Congo v Republic of Rwanda
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Arrêt
- Mots clés
- Admissibilité
- Résumé
- DRC alleges human rights violations committed in connection with an armed conflict between it and a coalition that includes Rwanda and the M23 armed group. The Court determined that it has jurisdiction to hear the matter and declared the application admissible. The Court ordered the Respondent State to file its response on the merits.
- Etat
- République Démocratique du Congo
- Rwanda
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Democratic Republic of the Congo: 4° 2′ 18″ S, 21° 45′ 31″ ERwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
ECW/CCJ/JUD/02/25 - The Incorporated Trustees of Prince & Princess Charles Offokoja Foundation & Anor. v Nigeria
- Aperçu

- Type de document
- Arrêt
- Mots clés
- Admissibilité
- Compétence de la Cour
- Délai raisonnable
- Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
- Parties au procès
- Violations des droits de l'homme
- Résumé de l'affaire
- ECOWAS Court has jurisdiction over human rights violations under Article 9(4) of its Protocol. Mere allegation of human rights violation is sufficient to confer jurisdiction. The Court is not an appellate body for national court decisions but can hear claims of human rights violations arising from domestic proceedings. Cause of action exists when facts disclose a legal right, even if not yet legally maintained. Admissibility requires claimants to have victim status, not be anonymous, and not have the matter pending in another international court. NGOs with legal personality can represent victims in human rights claims. Representative actions require proof of victim status of grantor; indirect victims must provide credible evidence of relationship. Application dismissed due to lack of locus standi; grantors of mandate were neither direct nor indirect victims. Parties bear their own costs.
- État
- Nigeria
- Conclusion
- Déclaré irrecevable
- Année de la décision
- 13 mai 2025
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
010/11 Efoua Mbozo’o Samuel v. The Pan African Parliament
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Décision
- Mots clés
- Droits des travailleurs
- Juridiction
- Résumé
- Efoua Mbozo'o Samuel, domiciled in Yaoundé, Cameroon,brought before the Court, a case against the Pan African Parliament, alleging breach of paragraph 4 of hiscontract of employment and of Article 13 (a) and (b) of the OAU Staff Regulations, and improper refusal torenew his contract and to re-grade him
- Etat
- UA/Organe de l'UA
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- Aucun indiqué
Décision de la Cour africaine
01/08 Michelot Yogogombaye v Senegal (Separate Opinion - Fatsah Ouguergouz)
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Opinion séparée
- Mots clés
- Droit à l'information
- Justice transitionnelle
- Procédure de la Cour Africaine
- Rétroactivité de l'infraction
- Résumé
- Fatsah Ouguergouz is of the opinion that the Applicant indeed has the right to know why it has taken nearly one year between the date of receipt of his application at the Registry and the date on which the Court took its decision thereon. Senegal, on the other hand, has the right to know why the Court chose to make a solemn ruling on the application by means of a Judgment, rather than reject it de plano with a simple letter issued by the Registry. The two Parties also have the right to know the reasons for which their prayers in respect of the costs and expenses, respectively, of the case, have been rejected; the Applicant should also know why his prayer in this regard was addressed on the basis of Rule 30 of the Interim Rules of the Court (hereinafter referred toas the "Rules") on Legal Costs, whereas the Court could have equally, if not exclusively, treated this prayer on the basis of Rule 31 on Legal Assistance.
- Etat
- Sénégal
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- Aucun indiqué
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Senegal: 14° 29′ 51″ N, 14° 27′ 9″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
ECW/CCJ/JUD/26/19 Salifo Sawadogo v Burkina Faso
- Aperçu

- Type de document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Immunité / Privilèges (diplomatiques, présidentiels, parlementaires, etc.)
- Insurrection
- Justice transitionnelle
- Sécurité intérieure de l'État
- Tribunaux militaires
- Résumé de l'affaire
- Following the failure of the military coup d'état in Burkina Faso on 16th September 2015, judicial information was opened against all persons who participated as author, co-author or accomplice of the coup; Accordingly, there were apparent elements from the investigation of this process likely to determinate the criminal liability of the applicant, Mr SAWADOGO Salifou, then a Parliament Member in the National Assembly; In view of the gravity of the facts, the Military Court wanted the applicant's criminal liability to be invoked, as those of other persons persecuted for the same facts.
- État
- Burkina Faso
- Conclusion
- Déclaré irrecevable
- Année de la décision
- 26 sept. 2019
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Burkina Faso: 12° 14′ 18″ N, 1° 33′ 42″ W
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
ECW/CCJ/JUD/21/25 - Charles Nii Armah Mensah v. Republic of Ghana and Gaming Commission
- Aperçu

- Type de document
- Décision
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Abus des pouvoirs présidentiels
- Diligence raisonnable
- Droits civils et politiques
- Juridiction
- Liberté d'expression / Droits numériques
- Liberté de la personne
- Mise en œuvre des décisions
- Résumé de l'affaire
- he ECOWAS Court ruled on the jurisdiction, admissibility, and merits of the dispute involving the rights of the applicant against the State and regulatory authority, addressing freedom of expression, due process, and implementation of national and regional legal provisions
- État
- Ghana
- Conclusion
- Affaire rejetée
- Année de la décision
- 8 mai 2025
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
ECW/CCJ/JUD/39/25 La Ligue Togolaise des Droits de l’Homme and Seven (07) Others v. Togo
- Aperçu

- Type de document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Liberté d'association
- Liberté de circulation
- Liberté de réunion
- Opérations des milices / Conflits armés
- Right to Physical and Moral Integrity
- Violations des droits de l'homme
- Résumé de l'affaire
- Human rights claims require credible, concrete evidence, not mere assertions. States bear positive obligations to protect rights but liability depends on failure to fulfill these duties demonstrably. Freedom of movement, assembly, and security rights are fundamental but may be subject to lawful restrictions. Allegations of militia violence require evidence linking the militias to the State for State responsibility. The ECOWAS Court will not rule on claims lacking proof of rights violations.
- Conclusion
- Décidé sur le fond
- Année de la décision
- 7 juil. 2025
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Togo: 8° 37′ 10″ N, 0° 49′ 29″ E
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
046/2016 - APDF & IHRDA v Republic of Mali
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Droit des femmes à la succession
- Droits des femmes
- IHRDA
- Législation nationale
- Mariage des enfants
- Pratiques traditionnelles néfastes
- Résumé
- In a bid to modernise its legislation by bringing it in line with the evolving international human rights law, the Government of Mali launched, in 1998, a vast operation to codify the rights of individuals and the family. This project, which was subject to broad popular consultation, received expert input prior to the drafting of Law No. 201 1-087 establishing the Persons and Family Code. However, the Applicants submit that the law as promulgated violates several provisions of international human rights instruments ratified by the Respondent State.
- Etat
- Mali
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Mali: 17° 34′ 14″ N, 3° 59′ 46″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
007/11 Youssef Ababou v. Morocco
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Décision
- Mots clés
- Citoyenneté/nationalité et droits connexes
- Juridiction
- Résumé
- In his application, the Applicant alleges as follows: - the Kingdom of Morocco has refused, and continues to refuse, to issue him his documents, which include, a national identity card and a passport;- it has been many years since he started requesting his rights to these civil status documents from the Consulate General of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Ambassador of the Kingdom of Morocco in Algeria, “but the latter have systematically refused to respect [his] rights to these documents".
- Etat
- Maroc
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- Aucun indiqué
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Morocco: 31° 47′ 30″ N, 7° 5′ 33″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
ECW/CCJ/JUD/17/25 - Lacerda Yoann v. Republic of Cabo Verde
- Aperçu

- Type de document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Admissibilité
- Développement économique, social et culturel
- Dommages-intérêts
- Droit à la santé
- Épuisement des recours locaux
- Juridiction
- Violations des droits de l'homme
- Résumé de l'affaire
- In Lacerda Yoann v. Republic of Cabo Verde (Application No. ECW/CCJ/APP/38/23; Judgment No. ECW/CCJ/JUD/17/25, 7 April 2025), the ECOWAS Court of Justice confirmed its jurisdiction and declared the application admissible. The Applicant, a Cabo Verde citizen, claimed that the State violated his right to health under Article 16 of the African Charter, Article 12 of the ICESCR, and Article 25 of the UDHR, by failing to provide access to necessary medicines for his hereditary immunodeficiency. The Court found that the Defendant State had authorized the import of the medicine and provided guidance on accessing it, but the Applicant failed to follow the prescribed procedures. Consequently, the Court held that the Defendant did not violate the Applicant’s right to health, dismissed all other claims as unfounded, and ordered that the parties bear their own costs.
- État
- Cap Vert
- Conclusion
- Décidé sur le fond
- Année de la décision
- 7 avr. 2025
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Cape Verde: 16° 32′ 20″ N, 23° 2′ 30″ W
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
005/11 Daniel Amare & Mulugeta Amare v. Mozambique & Mozambique Airlines
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Décision
- Mots clés
- Manque de compétence manifesté par la Cour africaine
- Juridiction
- Résumé
- In their application, the Applicants allege as follows, namely that: - In or about November 2008, having procured the requisite passports, visas and air tickets, they set out to travel to Maputo, Mozambique via Nairobi, Kenya.- At Nairobi, they transited from the Ethiopian Airlines to a Mozambique Airline flight to Maputo.- However, the flight did not take them to Maputo but landed in Pemba, Mozambique, where they were stranded for a period of twenty six (26) days.4. The Applicants further allege that: - During that period, they were subjected by the Mozambique Immigration Officials to diverse hardships, including demands for bribes, which they resisted, confiscating of their passports and visas, robbery of $1000 from them, torture, and deportation to Dar-es-Salaam.
- Etat
- Mozambique
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- Aucun indiqué
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Mozambique: 18° 39′ 57″ S, 35° 31′ 46″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
020/2015 – Livinus Daudi Manyuka v. United Republic of Tanzania
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Arrêt
- Mots clés
- Allégations de vol à main armée
- Arrestation et détention arbitraire
- Délai raisonnable
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
- Liberté de circulation
- Rétroactivité de l'infraction
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Résumé
- It emerges from the Application that on 4 November 1999 the Applicant, and two other individuals, were charged with the offence of robbery with violence in the District Court at Mbinga, Ruvuma Region. On 15 May 2000, they were convicted and each sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment.
- Etat
- Tanzanie
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- Aucun indiqué
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
004/2015 – Andrew Ambrose Cheusi v. United Republic of Tanzania
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Allégations de vol à main armée
- Délai raisonnable
- Droit à la dignité
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Résumé
- It emerges from the application that, on 6 June 2003, the applicant was arrested for having committed armed robbery of a pick-up vehicle at a place known as Sinza Madukani, in Dar es Salaam. He was prosecuted for the offense before the Kibaha District Magistrate Court. He was released on bail on 7 November 2003. While he was out on bail in this case, on September 2004, he was again arrested and charged in a second case before the same court, for conspiring to commit a felony and for the offence of robbery. It was alleged that he had stolen a saloon car at korogwe area in kibaha District.
- Etat
- Tanzanie
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- CADHP 7.1.c : Droit à la défense
- CADHP 7.1.d : Droit d'être jugé dans un délai raisonnable par un tribunal impartial
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
004/2015 – Andrew Ambrose Cheusi v. United Republic of Tanzania (Separate Opinion By Judge Bensaoula Chafika)
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Opinion séparée
- Mots clés
- Allégations de vol à main armée
- Délai raisonnable
- Droit à la dignité
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Résumé
- It emerges from the application that, on 6 June 2003, the applicant was arrested for having committed armed robbery of a pick-up vehicle at a place known as Sinza Madukani, in Dar es Salaam. He was prosecuted for the offense before the Kibaha District Magistrate Court. He was released on bail on 7 November 2003. While he was out on bail in this case, on September 2004, he was again arrested and charged in a second case before the same court, for conspiring to commit a felony and for the offence of robbery. It was alleged that he had stolen a saloon car at korogwe area in kibaha District.
- Etat
- Tanzanie
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- CADHP 7.1.c : Droit à la défense
- CADHP 7.1.d : Droit d'être jugé dans un délai raisonnable par un tribunal impartial
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
028/2015 – Kalebi Elisamehe v. United Republic of Tanzania
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
- Infractions sexuelles
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- VBG
- Viol
- Résumé
- It emerges from the application that, on 6 March 2004, the applicant was convicted and sentenced by the District Magistrate’s Court of Monduli at monduli District to a thirty (30) year prison sentence for the rape of a twelve (12) year old minor. He was ordered to pay the victim one cow valued at Tanzania Shillings Two Hundred Thousand as compensation. The applicant appealed against the judgement.
- Etat
- Tanzanie
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- CADHP 7.1.c : Droit à la défense
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
App 001/2019 for Judgment on Review of App. No. 030/2015 – Ramadhani Issa Malengo v. United Republic of Tanzania
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Arrêt
- Mots clés
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Résumé
- It emerges from the file that in 1996, the Applicant had an oral agreement with DIMON Ramadhani lssa Malengo (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant") is a national of Tanzania and a tobacco farmer. He resides in Kigwa village, Tabora region and alleges that the Respondent State violated his rights by denying him justice in the National courts.
- Etat
- Tanzanie
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
025/2015 – Majid Goa aliad Vedatus v. United Republic of Tanzania
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Égalité devant la loi
- Lutte contre la discrimination
- Viol
- Résumé
- It emerges from the file that on 20 December 2005, the District Court of Tarime, in Criminal case No. 418 of 2005 convicted the Applicant and sentenced him to thirty (30) years imprisonment following conviction for rape of a twelve (12) year old minor.
- Etat
- Tanzanie
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- CADHP 7.1.c : Droit à la défense
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
017/2015 – Kennedy Gihana and Others v. Republic of Rwanda
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Citoyenneté/nationalité et droits connexes
- Droit à la famille
- Droit au travail
- Liberté de circulation
- Liberté de la personne
- Participation au gouvernement
- Résumé
- It emerges from the file that the Applicants learnt of the invalidation, by the Respondent State, of their passports and those of other Rwandan nationals when one of them was informed upon applying for a visa to travel to the United States of America, that his name appeared on a list of 14 May 2012, indicating the invalidity of the passports held by all persons included on the said list.
- Etat
- Rwanda
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- CADHP 12:2: Droit de quitter tout pays, y compris le sien, et de revenir dans son pays
- CADHP 13.1: Droit de participer librement au gouvernement
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
017/2015 – Kennedy Gihana and Others v. Republic of Rwanda (Order on Continuance of Proceedings)
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Ordonnance de poursuite de la procédure
- Mots clés
- Citoyenneté/nationalité et droits connexes
- Droit à la famille
- Droit au travail
- Liberté de circulation
- Liberté de la personne
- Participation au gouvernement
- Résumé
- It emerges from the file that the Applicants learnt of the invalidation, by the Respondent State, of their passports and those of other Rwandan nationals when one of them was informed upon applying for a visa to travel to the United States of America, that his name appeared on a list of 14 May 2012, indicating the invalidity of the passports held by all persons included on the said list.
- Etat
- Rwanda
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- CADHP 12:2: Droit de quitter tout pays, y compris le sien, et de revenir dans son pays
- CADHP 13.1: Droit de participer librement au gouvernement
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
016/2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Arrêt
- Mots clés
- Droit à la vie
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Meurtre/assassinat
- Peine de mort
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Résumé
- It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
- Etat
- Ghana
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
016/2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana (Order for provisional mesures (28 September 2017))
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Ordonnance de mesures provisoires
- Mots clés
- Droit à la vie
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Meurtre/assassinat
- Peine de mort
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Résumé
- It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
- Etat
- Ghana
- Droits violés (dispositions de la CADHP)
- Aucun indiqué
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
016-2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana (Dissenting Opinion of Judge Blaise TCHIKAYA)
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Opinion dissidente
- Mots clés
- Droit à la vie
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Meurtre/assassinat
- Peine de mort
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Résumé
- It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
- Etat
- Ghana
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
016/2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana (Partly dissenting opinion of Judges Gérard Niyungeko and Rafâa Ben Achour)
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Opinion dissidente
- Mots clés
- Droit à la vie
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Meurtre/assassinat
- Peine de mort
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Résumé
- It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
- Etat
- Ghana
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
016/2017 – Dexter Eddie Johnson v. Republic of Ghana (Dissenting Opinion of Judge Rafaâ Ben ACHOUR)
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Opinion dissidente
- Mots clés
- Droit à la vie
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Meurtre/assassinat
- Peine de mort
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Résumé
- It emerges, from the Application, that on 27 May 2OO4, an American National was killed near the village of Ningo in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The Applicant was accused of committing this crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 18 June 2008, the Fast Track High Court in Accra, convicted the Applicant of the murder and sentenced him to death.
- Etat
- Ghana
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Ghana: 7° 56′ 47″ N, 1° 1′ 23″ W
Décision de la Cour africaine
004/2017 Mulindahabi Fidèle v Republic of Rwanda
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Droit au travail
- Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
- Droits des travailleurs
- Égalité devant la loi
- Renvoi sans préavis
- Résumé
- It is apparent from the record, that, on 17 November 2009, following his success in a recruitment test, the applicant signed an employment contract for the position of Head of the Planning and Strategy Section at the State-owned Rwanda Electricity Corporation and Rwanda Water and Sanitation Corporation, which later became the Energy, Water and Sanitation Authority (EWSA). On 13 April 2010, the applicant was dismissed without notice.
- Etat
- Rwanda
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
004/2017 Mulindahabi Fidèle v Republic of Rwanda (Separate Opinion of Judges Rafâa Ben Achour and Blaise Tchikaya (26 June 2020))
- Aperçu

- Type de Document
- Opinion séparée
- Mots clés
- Droit au travail
- Droit d'être entendu par un tribunal compétent
- Droits des travailleurs
- Égalité devant la loi
- Renvoi sans préavis
- Résumé
- It is apparent from the record, that, on 17 November 2009, following his success in a recruitment test, the applicant signed an employment contract for the position of Head of the Planning and Strategy Section at the State-owned Rwanda Electricity Corporation and Rwanda Water and Sanitation Corporation, which later became the Energy, Water and Sanitation Authority (EWSA). On 13 April 2010, the applicant was dismissed without notice.
- Etat
- Rwanda
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Décision de la Cour africaine
MOSES ABIODUN V FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
- Aperçu

- Type de document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Admissibilité
- Allégations de vol à main armée
- Arrestation et détention arbitraire
- Brutalités et infractions policières
- Centres de détention/Conditions
- Délai raisonnable
- Droit à un procès équitable
- Droits civils et politiques
- IHRDA
- Juridiction
- Liberté de circulation
- Liberté de la personne
- Traitement cruel et dégradant
- Violations des droits de l'homme
- Résumé de l'affaire
- Jurisdiction & Admissibility – The Court has jurisdiction under Article 9(4) of its Protocol; the Application was admissible. Arbitrary Detention – Applicant was detained from 2009 to 2025 without trial or formal charges, violating Articles 6 and 9 of the African Charter/ICCPR. Freedom of Movement – Prolonged detention violated Article 12 of the African Charter/ICCPR. Right to Fair Trial – Detention without trial for over 16 years breached Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter. Cruel & Inhuman Treatment – Prolonged pretrial detention constituted inhuman and degrading treatment (Articles 5 and 7). Reparations – Court ordered immediate release and payment of 20 million naira in compensation; each party bears its own costs.
- État
- Nigeria
- Conclusion
- Décidé sur le fond
- Année de la décision
- 15 mai 2025
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
ECW/CCJ/JUD/35/25 Eliam Monsedjoueni Potey v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire
- Aperçu

- Type de document
- Jugement
- Mots clés
- Dommages-intérêts
- Droit d'exercer une profession
- Égalité devant la loi
- Lutte contre la discrimination
- Violations des droits de l'homme
- Résumé de l'affaire
- Jurisdiction: The ECOWAS Court has jurisdiction over alleged human rights violations by Member States. Admissibility: The case was admissible as the applicant was identified and no parallel international proceedings existed. Equality Before the Law: Alleged discrimination must be proven with objective evidence; mere claims are insufficient. Discretionary Promotion: Executive discretion in judicial promotions does not automatically violate equality rights. Reparations: Compensation is only awarded if a rights violation is established.
- État
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Conclusion
- Affaire rejetée
- Année de la décision
- 2 juil. 2025
- Géolocalisation du pays
- Côte d'Ivoire: 7° 32′ 24″ N, 5° 32′ 49″ WComoros: 11° 38′ 44″ S, 43° 19′ 60″ E
Cour de justice de la CEDEAO
30 Listé sur un total de 1414 Entités