4. The Plaintiff Counsel filed on 21 February 2012, his written submissions in respect of the Preliminary Objections raised by the Federal Republic of Nigeria. 5. The Court heard the Parties on 23 February 2012 on the Preliminary Objections raised by the Federal Republic of Nigeria in respect of lack of jurisdiction. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES As regards the Federal Republic of Nigeria 6. Counsel for the Federal Republic of Nigeria maintained that the Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on the case, by virtue of the force of res judicata arising from the judgment of the High Court of Abuja (FCT). He contended, in that regard, that Plaintiff lodged an application before the said High Court which is similar in every respect to the Application brought before the instant court. He argued further that on 19 May 2011, the judge of the said High Court granted Plaintiff’s requests and awarded him damages in the amount of Five Million Naira (N 5,000,000). He pleaded that the Application brought by Plaintiff was lodged on 13 June 2011, well after the judgment delivered by that High Court. He therefore concluded that the instant Court is compelled by the force of res judicata to refrain from examining the Application by Plaintiff. As regards the Applicant 7. Plaintiff Counsel, on his part, maintained that the Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate on the case and asked the Court to use its own discretion as to the force of res judicata. ANALYSIS OF THE COURT 8. The Application before the Court deals with human rights violation, notably violation of Articles 4, 5, 6 and 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The Court has indicated on several occasions that it has jurisdiction to adjudicate on a case once the matter brought relates to human rights violation and where the subject-matter of the application is to ask the Court to find that such violation has occurred in a Member State (cf. Hissein Habré v. Senegal, Judgment of 14 May 2010, paragraphs 53, 58 and 59; Case Concerning Alhaji Muhammad Ibrahim Hassan v. Gombe State and Nigeria, Judgment of 15 March 2012, paragraph 38). Consequently, the case 3

اختر الفقرة المستهدفة3